top of page
Search

Bill Shorten

Updated: Dec 31, 2023

Bill Shorten is the Minister for NDIS and Government Services under the Albanese Labor Government. He was the leader of the Australian Labor Party during the 2019 Federal Election and campaigned heavily for greater utilisation of electric vehicles.

Bill Shorten smiling in a black suit jacket and tie, with the text "Bill Shorten" foregrounded.

The NDIS

As Minister for the NDIS Mr. Shorten has overseen a number of changes to the disability welfare program including the introduction of a crackdown on price-gouging providers and introducing an 8% cap on the growth of the scheme


With more than 600,000 Australians with disabilities now participating in the scheme, the NDIS is expected to cost Australians up to $100 billion a year within the next decade raising concerns that it may become unsustainable. 


In December of 2023 a review of the NDIS was released which included 26 recommendations regarding the program’s cost, its focus on disabled individuals and the public’s confidence in the scheme. The review’s authors proposed a 5-year plan to grow disability services and foundational supports existing outside of the scheme and stated that:

“Our view is that you can’t fix the NDIS without fixing everything around it.” 

Mr. Shorten welcomed the review and stated that he was determined to improve the NDIS. He also hoped that future governments would continue to cooperate and ensure the required changes throughout the proposed 5-year timeline. 


Speaking to the National Press Club, Mr. Shorten spoke on the need to improve the NDIS and stated that no one wished to return to a time where Australians were “at the mercy of a broken system”:

“We need to develop supports for people whose disability doesn’t have a significant impact on their daily life or impact their daily functioning in the same way…These supports would create a continuum so there would not be such a focus on being ‘in’ or ‘out’ of the NDIS.”

Shadow Disability Minister, Michael Sukkar, was skeptical of the review and commented that it “left many questions unanswered and stones unturned”. Mr. Sukkar also questioned how Mr. Shorten would be able to maintain the scheme’s 8% growth cap alongside the proposed reforms:

“There is still very little detail on how the scheme’s 8% growth cap will be met. Although, it seems clear that the government will seek to deny access to the NDIS for children with autism and developmental delay…Participants also remain in the dark on what the new ‘foundational supports’ will look like, whether these will ever be comparable to the NDIS, and when these supports will commence.”

Robodebt Class Action

In September of  2019 Mr. Shorten called for the Coalition Government to suspend the robodebt scheme and announced a class action lawsuit undertaken by Gordan Legal on behalf of hundreds of thousands of Australians affected by the scheme. 


As part of his announcement, Mr. Shorten described how there had been "a pattern from the commonwealth of wiping the debt at the centre of legal challenges,  possibly because the government was “scared” to prove the legal basis of the scheme, and that pointed to grounds for legal challenge."


Mr. Shorten stated the proposed class action would allege that the federal government had financially benefitted as a result of the robodebt scheme in instances where it wrongfully collected money that legitimately belonged to recipients.

In November of 2020, the day before the case was set to begin, the government agreed to settle the class action for $1.2 billion. The settlement also included commitments to repay $720 million in incorrectly collected debts, a further $400 million cleared in unlawful debt demands and 400,000 Australians were to receive $112 million in additional compensation. 


However, the government did not admit to any liability or knowledge of the scheme’s unlawfulness as part of the settlement.


Mr. Shorten remarked on the settlement, suggesting that the government was only paying back the incorrect debts as a result of court pressure:

“Call me a bit sceptical, but the only reason why the Morrison government surrendered is they had the hot breath of the court on their throat."

In the aftermath of the settlement, Mr. Shorten remained a strong proponent of a Royal Commission into the scheme. As described by The Saturday Paper, Mr. Shorten "had been relentless in his determination to expose the full extent of what he calls the “greatest failure of public administration and social security”."

Removal of ‘birthing parent’ from Medical Forms Provokes Backlash

On July 21st 2022 Mr. Shorten announced on Twitter that he had instructed officials to change forms, used at several hospitals which featured the term 'birthing parent', to alternate forms which utilised the term 'mother':

“When I was informed on this situation yesterday, I instructed the responsible officials they should cease. They will be replaced with new forms that use the word mother, not birthing parent, which is consistent with other Medicare forms.

The term 'birthing parent' was featured in forms at only three hospitals as part of a trial. The forms were for parents to register the birth of their child with Medicare, with only 1100 parents having participated. Mr. Shorten claimed forms featuring the term 'birthing parents' were “part of a pilot program launched in three hospitals under the previous Coalition government”.


Prior to Mr. Shorten's announcement, Sall Grover, the founder of a female social network which excludes trans women, had posted to Twitter stating that the term 'birthing parent' is "absolute bullshit is exclusionary, alienating and derogatory towards every woman [who] wants to be and is called ‘mother’.”


Ms. Grover's comments were featured in an article for the Daily Telegraph, with other media outlets also picking up the story. The Daily Telegraph also reported that 55 men gave birth to children in 2014-2015, according to Medicare records. Mr. Shorten referenced the Daily Telegraph story in his Twitter announcement.


In 2013, the Labor government amended the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 to include protections from discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex status. This functionally resulted in transgender and intersex people no longer being required to disclose or explain their gender in order to receive medical treatment through Medicare.

Sources & Further Reading














451 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Plagued

Commentaires


bottom of page